You might have heard about a new movie coming out called
A Scanner Darkly. I say "might have" because chances are you haven't seen it. It opened this week...in 17 whole theaters, none of which are near me. Not surprising considering it's an indie flick that's partially animated (rotoscoped is the proper term, I believe) and based on one of Philip K. Dick's more paranoid drug screeds.
I've been looking forward to seeing the flick since I heard about it, but I decided that I wouldn't rush out and see it before I read the book. The movies love Philip K. Dick, but they haven't exactly been kind to his work. His heroes never resembled Harrison Ford, Arnold Swarzenegger, or Tom Cruise. (They don't resemble Keanu Reeves, either, but that's a minor point.)
Now it looks like I had no choice in the matter. I couldn't see the damn thing if I wanted to.
I do, however, have the book and have even cracked it open. I'm only a few chapters in, but I can tell you that it's not one of Dick's best works. If you want to know anything about the man behind
Blade Runner,
Minority Report,
Total Recall, et cetera, you should know these three things:
1) Dick took lots of speed. And this was before the meth epidemic.
2) Being fueled by speed, Dick was extremely prolific, over 40 novels and hundreds of short stories, not to mention his own unpublished journal, written in longhand and numbering over a thousand pages.
3) Dick was a little crazy.
All three things are connected, obviously. The speed he took gave him the stamina to write his novels in weeks, rather than months or years like most novelists. The speed also drove him nuts.
In his later years, he thought that he had been contacted by some extra-terrestial intelligence called VALIS (short for
Vast Active Living Intelligence System) that revealed this world to be an illusion and Dick to be one of its patron saints. The whole story is quite complicated, and quite nutso, but Dick didn't believe he was visited by aliens. He thought he was in direct contact with God.
A Scanner Darkly dates from this period, where the bats were swooping around in the belfry, and is a much more flawed work than some of his best science fiction, like
Man in the High Castle, which won the Hugo, or
Eye in the Sky, which I read in a single day.
It's not even science fiction, per se. It's an accurate description of how Dick saw the world, a police state where the freaks and the straights are engaged in a clandestine civil war, a society where paranoia is taken to such absurd lengths that you can't even trust yourself.
It's definitely
Phildickian, but don't take it as the definitive Phil Dick story. That would probably be
Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said. But don't expect a movie out of that one anytime soon.